March 12, 2008 7:26 AM
The N.Y. Times: Spitzer Wrestles Over Response, Paralyzing Albany
Seems like this is getting out of hand now. It is one thing to push Mr. Spitzer in to defending himself, but a whole different ball game to challenge him to fight back.
Of course it is Spitzer's responsibility. He could have put his foot down and refuse. The potential of someone getting hurt was too great. It would have been beneficial if he had made himself familiar with the rules before jumping in the ring. He should have taken that in to consideration.
I am wondering why it had to be a wresting match and why he had to fight Mr. Response. What does he have to do with it? Those wrestlers sure got some akward names. Who would call their son Response? Anyway, that's not my business.
Something else I am confused about... why was Albany there? She should have been gone. Long gone! I suppose she was trying to be supportive and got caught in the middle in the heat of the fight. Spitzer was probably too occupied and oblivious to his surroundings.
And now poor Albany got paralyzed in the wrestling match. I suppose Spitzer did put his foot down, just in the wrong place and on the wrong person.
Wisdom spouted by BLOND at March 12, 2008 7:26 AM
0
OPINIONS
» POST A COMMENT
| DIGG IT
« BACK HOME